Export limit exceeded: 407937 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 407937 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (407937 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73273 | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Gitea's Maven upload handler reads checksum uploads entirely into memory and returns before enforcing package-size quotas. An authenticated user with package-publish permission can submit an oversized body to a checksum endpoint despite legitimate checksum values being at most 128 bytes. This bypasses the upload quota on that path and can exhaust server memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73135 | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Gitea uses inconsistent repository visibility predicates, and the condition used by some repository-listing endpoints admits repositories whose owners are hidden from the viewer. Those listings disclose repository metadata even though direct routes correctly deny access with a 404 response. The issue exposes repository existence and listing information across the intended owner-visibility boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73130 | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Gitea does not limit the length of the gitignores field accepted by repository-creation forms and the API. Repository initialization splits the field into template names, repeatedly reads the referenced templates, and buffers their contents in memory. An attacker who can create repositories can submit an oversized value to amplify template reads and memory use, impairing availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73126 | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Gitea's Actions workflow status badge endpoint does not enforce repository-read scope or the public-only restriction on the token authenticating the request. A token lacking read:repository, or restricted to public repositories, can retrieve the latest workflow status of a private repository accessible to its owner. This discloses private workflow status beyond the token's intended delegated permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71385 | 2026-10-14 | 8.4 High | ||
| ColdFusion is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerable component is restricted to an administrative network zone by default. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71184 | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High | ||
| Gitea's pull request review notifier does not attach the pull request to the Actions notification, so the fork workflow approval gate does not recognize the run as originating from a fork. Review comment and review approval or rejection events can consequently load workflow code from the fork head and run it on the base repository's runners without the required maintainer approval. This allows execution of fork-controlled workflow code across the intended approval boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70407 | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Gitea's organization-list API does not enforce the read:organization token scope. A token limited to another category, such as read:misc, can retrieve organization metadata visible to its owner. For a site administrator's token, the response can include Limited and private organizations, bypassing the intended restriction on the token's delegated access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70406 | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Gitea's shared comparison helper omits the token repository-access check used when updating pull requests. A public-only token with read:repository scope can route a comparison or pull request creation through a public base repository and retrieve commit history and diffs from a private head repository accessible to the token owner. This bypasses the token's public-only restriction; it does not remove the account's underlying repository permission checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70402 | 2026-10-14 | 5.8 Medium | ||
| Gitea creates server-side Git hook directories and scripts with mode 0777 and relies on the process umask to restrict access. With a permissive umask such as 0000 or 0002, another local user who can reach the repository storage may modify a hook or add an executable to a writable hook directory. A later Git operation can execute that file as the Gitea service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70400 | 2026-10-14 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Gitea's repository migration API accepts a public-only token when the request specifies creation of a private repository. A delegated token intended to operate only on public resources can create a private repository and migration task under the authorizing account or an organization where that user has the necessary permissions. The ordinary private repository-creation route rejects the same token, but the migration path omits that restriction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34633 | 2026-10-14 | 7.7 High | ||
| ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16495 | 2026-10-14 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Countdown Timer – Widget Countdown plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'redirect_url' Shortcode Attribute in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14909 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server Liberty | 2026-10-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.9 is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information when restConnector-2.0 is enbabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14851 | 1 Copart | 1 Copart S Online Billing Service | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| A vulnerability relating to the exposure of confidential information in the customer invoicing web application, which exposes personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data – including customer names, addresses, invoice numbers, payment details and tax information – to unauthorised individuals. The issue is caused by a lack of authorisation checks at the endpoint responsible for serving PDF invoice files. Furthermore, some URLs for invoicing documents appear to be publicly accessible via search engines, exposing paths to confidential files. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to access data to which they should not have access, as well as to predict identifiers in order to access even more confidential information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110449 | 1 Nixos | 1 Nix | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| Nix before 2.35.3 and Lix before 2.95.4 have an integer overflow and resultant out-of-bounds write when evaluating untrusted expressions because list allocation is mishandled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110359 | 2026-10-14 | 7.8 High | ||
| Hyland Desktop Host for Windows before 25.1.1 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation. This is caused by a privileged service running from the %PROGRAMDATA%\Hyland\DesktopHost\bin folder with weak permissions. A local user can exploit this to escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109970 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-10-14 | 4.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the clevis PKCS#11 pin. The clevis-luks-pkcs11-askpin script writes the PKCS#11 token PIN in plaintext to a file without setting restrictive permissions. Under the default process umask, the file is world-readable. Additionally, the PIN file is not reliably cleaned up if the decryption script exits early, leaving the PIN accessible indefinitely. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109963 | 1 Froxlor | 1 Froxlor | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Froxlor before 2.3.14 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the email template editor (admin_templates.php) because the mail body is fetched by mailbodyid without an adminid ownership check. Authenticated reseller admins can pair their own subjectid with sequential foreign mailbodyid values in edit requests to read other admins' email templates, including the full administrator's. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109523 | 1 Girishsaraf | 1 Online-appointment-booking-system | 2026-10-14 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in girishsaraf Online-Appointment-Booking-System up to f427b4757128ca253d33d0cc4e87bbb9c999a4d5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file Admin/getclinic.php of the component AJAX Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument city/cid results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109519 | 1 Youtransfer | 1 Youtransfer | 2026-10-14 | 8.3 High |
| A vulnerability was detected in YouTransfer up to 0.0.7/1.0.6/1.1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /settings/template of the component Template Rendering. The manipulation results in path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||