Export limit exceeded: 405223 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (405223 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-71430 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Frappe before 14.99.10 and 15.x before 15.91.1 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the leaderboard page because user names are rendered without proper neutralization. Authenticated attackers can set a crafted user name that executes arbitrary JavaScript in the browsers of other users who view the leaderboard. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58391 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| Frappe before 14.58.0 and 15.x before 15.4.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in printview because printview parameters are not escaped before being rendered. Remote attackers can craft a malicious printview URL that, when visited by a victim, injects HTML and executes script in the victim's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58390 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 8.8 High |
| Frappe before 14.81.4 and 15.x before 15.41.0 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability involving a certain document action that permits escalation from the Website User role to System Manager. Authenticated attackers with Website User access can combine this document action with additional steps to obtain administrative System Manager privileges in the Frappe application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54412 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Frappe before 13.46.3 and 14.x before 14.21.1 contains an improper access control vulnerability in Email Template permissions that allows any authenticated non-guest user to create and edit any Email Template. Attackers with low-privileged accounts, including self-registered users when signup is enabled, can modify Email Templates used by the application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54411 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| Frappe framework before 13.32.0 uses weak authentication for print view access, because the print view key can be derived from data exposed by other whitelisted API endpoints. Attackers can generate a valid key to view documents through the print view without proper permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54410 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| Frappe before 13.22.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to rename documents by exploiting a missing permission check. Attackers can invoke the document rename functionality on documents they lack permission to modify, altering records without proper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54409 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 4.8 Medium |
| Frappe before 13.46.1 and 14.x before 14.20.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability because the html2text function weakly sanitizes user input. Authenticated attackers can supply crafted HTML that is insufficiently sanitized by html2text, executing scripts in the browsers of users who view the rendered content. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54408 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| Frappe before 13.52.0 and 14.x before 14.31.0 contains an HTML injection vulnerability caused by weak escaping of user-supplied content rendered in pages. Attackers can submit crafted HTML that bypasses the insufficient escaping and is rendered in the browsers of users who view it, enabling cross-site scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54407 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| Frappe 14.x before 14.45.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows users with error log access to view secrets stored in local variables captured in tracebacks. Attackers who can read error logs can extract plaintext secrets such as credentials or keys exposed in traceback local variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54406 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2026-10-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| Frappe before 14.59.0 and 15.x before 15.5.0 contains a sandbox flaw where the frappe.flags.in_safe_exec global flag can become False during Server Script execution when one server script triggers another. Authenticated high-privileged users can craft a Server Script that triggers other server scripts, such as by saving a document, so the remaining code runs without safe execution protections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66787 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-10-12 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in the lighthouse component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes. This vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of advertised IP addresses within EndpointSlice objects. A compromised spoke cluster can exploit this by creating EndpointSlices with attacker-controlled IP addresses, causing other clusters' lighthouse DNS to redirect legitimate service traffic to malicious endpoints. This enables a remote attacker to conduct transparent Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks on cross-cluster service communications, potentially leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85962 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-12 | 7.5 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 contain an improper authentication vulnerability in SAML processing. In deployments that use SAML authentication, an unauthenticated remote attacker could cause the affected server to accept an assertion that should be rejected, potentially resulting in unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108362 | 1 Privasys | 1 Ra-tls-clients | 2026-10-12 | N/A |
| Privasys Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.11.0, TEE attestation evidence in Privasys attested TLS is accepted without requiring an explicitly authorized platform identity. When a network attacker can forge evidence or extract attestation secrets from a compromised unrevoked platform, the verifier accepts valid measurements from a different unrevoked TEE platform as though they came from the intended Attester. The attacker can impersonate the attested TLS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85973 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-12 | 7.4 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 may use cleartext transport for certain cluster-management communications. A network-positioned attacker could intercept or modify information transmitted through an affected connection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59977 | 1 C4illin | 1 Convertx | 2026-10-12 | 8.1 High |
| ConvertX is a self-hosted file conversion service. Prior to 0.18.0, the /delete/{id} endpoint uses HTTP GET for permanent deletion without CSRF protection. If an authenticated user visits attacker-controlled content that requests /delete/{id}, the browser sends the user session cookie and the request deletes the targeted job, resulting in unauthorized loss of converted-file history. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108361 | 1 Privasys | 1 Ra-tls-clients | 2026-10-12 | N/A |
| Privasys Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Before 0.9.1, an attacker with local access could modify workload code, data, and configuration at any time after successful connection establishment. Once Evidence was successfully appraised and the connection was established, there was a window of vulnerability from the establishment of the connection to the termination of the connection where an attacker could modify the state of the workload and platform at runtime on the TLS endpoint acting as the Attester. This vulnerability was possible because Privasys/ra-tls-clients performed attestation only once in the lifetime of the connection (at connection establishment time), and the verifying peer continued to believe that the state was the same as in the initial Evidence throughout, whereas it could be stale at some point in time. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44828 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | ||
| Qexo is an open source online editor for static blogs. From 4.0.0 until 4.2.0, Qexo exposes /api/init_step/ through init_step_api without authentication, authorization, or a setup-completion guard. An unauthenticated requester with a valid CSRF token obtained from a public page can submit the first initialization step and reset the INIT setting, causing the instance to re-enter the setup flow. The setup response and /init/ page can expose stored PROVIDER configuration, including service credentials, in frontend content. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85471 | 1 Redhat | 2 Mirror Registry, Quay | 2026-10-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Quay. An authenticated repository administrator could bypass the hostname blacklist in webhook notifications, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This allows the Quay application to be tricked into sending requests to internal network resources, such as cloud metadata services or other services within the cluster. Consequently, this could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information from these internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85975 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-12 | 7.5 High |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 may use cleartext transport for Amazon S3 connections by default. A network-positioned attacker could intercept data or credentials transmitted through an affected connection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85976 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Marklogic Server | 2026-10-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 do not sufficiently sanitize input used by the Query Console file-exploration endpoint, which could allow HTTP response splitting and unintended client-side response handling. | ||||